It's good no matter which Boyle sister you get. But to take a woman who funded the overtaking of the empire getting stuck on an island with someone she probably doesn't even know. The first games non lethal options just all seem better to me, even in the DLC the options are pretty good except the first. I gotta say I think Lady Boyle is my favorite non lethal. So I would say killing him Is actually more merciful so I only use the machine when I think of him using it on others.
I do love his charisma, tons of fun, and I think if he had a choice he would rather die so I think it is more torturous to wipe him and make him his worst fear, a fool.
And making Jindosh more important than the Duke would have just ruined one of the more important missions. Oooooo I agree that D2 would have been better if Jindosh had a more central role, but since the game already had the Duke and Delilah, it might have been clustered. Sorry for that, I just don't think I've heard anyone mention that, and I wanted to get that off my chest and see if anyone agrees or disagrees. Off topic, but while D2 is my favorite game in the the franchise, and currently my favorite game that I've ever played, I think the story could've been much better if Jindosh was the main antagonist as Emily's long lost cousin or something, and Delilah wasn't there at all. I also view it in the same light as when the Men In Black wipe someone's memory and make them a new person I can see how some may view that as cruel, but I simply don't. I personally don't see Jindosh's non-lethal as cruel because he was a terrible person who clearly had no intention of using his genius to better the world. I ask to not start any arguments, as this is meant to be a post just asking where a lot of your morals/ethics lie in relation to this non-lethal option, and even which non-lethal you think was the most creative/cruel in the whole series. Based on what others have said, it seems that many people feel that Jindosh's non-lethal was extremely cruel, and I'm curious as to the reasoning.
0 kommentar(er)
